[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210108215900.GC3678@horizon.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:59:00 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5e: CT: Support offload of +trk+new ct
rules
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:30:48PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> @@ -1429,6 +1600,14 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_add_ft_cb(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *ct_priv, u16 zone,
> if (err)
> goto err_insert;
>
> + nf_ct_zone_init(&ctzone, zone, NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR, 0);
> + ft->tmpl = nf_ct_tmpl_alloc(&init_net, &ctzone, GFP_KERNEL);
I didn't test but I think this will add a hard dependency to
nf_conntrack_core and will cause conntrack to always be loaded by
mlx5_core, which is not good for some use cases.
nf_ct_tmpl_alloc() is defined in nf_conntrack_core.c.
762f926d6f19 ("net/sched: act_ct: Make tcf_ct_flow_table_restore_skb
inline") was done similarly to avoid this.
> + if (!ft->tmpl)
> + goto err_tmpl;
> +
> + __set_bit(IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT, &ft->tmpl->status);
> + nf_conntrack_get(&ft->tmpl->ct_general);
> +
> err = nf_flow_table_offload_add_cb(ft->nf_ft,
> mlx5_tc_ct_block_flow_offload, ft);
> if (err)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists