[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c11867d2-6fda-d77c-6b52-f4093c751379@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:45:20 +0200
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5e: CT: Preparation for offloading
+trk+new ct rules
On 2021-01-08 11:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:30:47PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> From: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
>>
>> Connection tracking associates the connection state per packet. The
>> first packet of a connection is assigned with the +trk+new state. The
>> connection enters the established state once a packet is seen on the
>> other direction.
>>
>> Currently we offload only the established flows. However, UDP traffic
>> using source port entropy (e.g. vxlan, RoCE) will never enter the
>> established state. Such protocols do not require stateful processing,
>> and therefore could be offloaded.
>
> If it doesn't require stateful processing, please enlight me on why
> conntrack is being used in the first place. What's the use case here?
>
The use case for example is when we have vxlan traffic but we do
conntrack on the inner packet (rules on the physical port) so
we never get established but on miss we can still offload as normal
vxlan traffic.
>>
>> The change in the model is that a miss on the CT table will be forwarded
>> to a new +trk+new ct table and a miss there will be forwarded to the slow
>> path table.
>
> AFAICU this new +trk+new ct table is a wildcard match on sport with
> specific dports. Also AFAICU, such entries will not be visible to the
> userspace then. Is this right?
>
> Marcelo
>
right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists