netdev - RE: [PATCH linux-next v3 6/6] vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user supported devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB432279609B19E1F4F0627652DCAA0@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 04:14:41 +0000
From:   Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH linux-next v3 6/6] vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user
 supported devices

Hi Michael,

> From: Virtualization <virtualization-bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org> On
> Behalf Of Parav Pandit
> > >
> > > When we add mac address attribute in add command, at that point also
> > remove the module parameter macaddr.
> >
> > Will that be mandatory? I'm not to happy with a UAPI we intend to
> > break straight away ...
> No. Specifying mac address shouldn't be mandatory. UAPI wont' be broken.

Shall we please proceed with this patchset?
I would like to complete the iproute2 part and converting remaining two drivers to follow mgmt tool subsequent to this series.