netdev - Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] can: usb: etas_es58X: add support for ETAS ES58X CAN USB interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:05:56 +0800
From:   Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@...bosch.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jimmy Assarsson <extja@...ser.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "open list : NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] can: usb: etas_es58X: add
 support for ETAS ES58X CAN USB interfaces



On 1/13/21 11:13 AM, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> On Tue 13 Jan 2021 at 00:29, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on v5.11-rc3 next-20210111]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> The patch is applied on linux-can-next/testing. All the warnings
> are related to the latest drivers/net/can/dev API changes.

Hi Vincent,

Thanks for the feedback, we'll try linux-can-next/testing next time.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

>
> I thought that the test robot only checked the
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org open list and I didn't bother adding
> the "--base". So this is my bad, sorry for that.
>
> Because this is a false positive, I will not send a new
> version (unless if requested).
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org