netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] can: usb: etas_es58X: add support for ETAS ES58X CAN USB interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqJNQ8MtLYu6i0Q3POBFYVrnFh3bUjiQC57vv-UqArCLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:13:39 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@...bosch.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jimmy Assarsson <extja@...ser.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "open list : NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] can: usb: etas_es58X: add support for ETAS ES58X
 CAN USB interfaces

On Tue 13 Jan 2021 at 00:29, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.11-rc3 next-20210111]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

The patch is applied on linux-can-next/testing. All the warnings
are related to the latest drivers/net/can/dev API changes.

I thought that the test robot only checked the
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org open list and I didn't bother adding
the "--base". So this is my bad, sorry for that.

Because this is a false positive, I will not send a new
version (unless if requested).


Yours sincerely,
Vincent