[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iK5N-u-DKLmAF4+RSiG1g4Y1YkcizTX5h12hsTdpMt0DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:11:59 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_tw_isn not being used
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:53 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 05:59:20 +0800 Pengcheng Yang wrote:
> > TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_tw_isn contains an ISN, chosen by
> > tcp_timewait_state_process() , when SYN is received in TIMEWAIT state.
> > But tcp_tw_isn is not used because it is overwritten by
> > tcp_v4_restore_cb() after commit eeea10b83a13 ("tcp: add
> > tcp_v4_fill_cb()/tcp_v4_restore_cb()").
> >
> > To fix this case, we record tcp_tw_isn before tcp_v4_restore_cb() and
> > then set it in tcp_v4_fill_cb(). V6 does the same.
> >
> > Fixes: eeea10b83a13 ("tcp: add tcp_v4_fill_cb()/tcp_v4_restore_cb()")
> > Reported-by: chenc <chenc9@...gsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@...gsu.com>
>
> Please fix the date and resend. This patch came in last night,
> but it has a date of December 28th.
Not this whole madness about tcp_v4_fill_cb()/tcp_v4_restore_cb()
could be reverted
now we have an RB tree for out-of-order packets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists