netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210115150246.550ae169@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:02:46 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes

On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in
> mv88e6xxx is optional.
> 
> This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware
> actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir).
> - Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir).

If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3,
LMK if I got it wrong.