netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:24:35 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> > The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in
> > mv88e6xxx is optional.
> > 
> > This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware
> > actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it.
> > 
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir).
> > - Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir).
> 
> If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3,
> LMK if I got it wrong.

I don't think a v3 was supposed to be coming, what made you think that?