[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210120084042.4d37dadb@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:40:42 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Hongbo Wang <hongbo.wang@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Po Liu <po.liu@....com>, Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>,
Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>,
Eldar Gasanov <eldargasanov2@...il.com>,
Andrey L <al@...omtech.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 15/16] net: dsa: felix: setup MMIO filtering
rules for PTP when using tag_8021q
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 01:07:48 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> Since the tag_8021q tagger is software-defined, it has no means by
> itself for retrieving hardware timestamps of PTP event messages.
>
> Because we do want to support PTP on ocelot even with tag_8021q, we need
> to use the CPU port module for that. The RX timestamp is present in the
> Extraction Frame Header. And because we can't use NPI mode which redirects
> the CPU queues to an "external CPU" (meaning the ARM CPU running Linux),
> then we need to poll the CPU port module through the MMIO registers to
> retrieve TX and RX timestamps.
>
> Sadly, on NXP LS1028A, the Felix switch was integrated into the SoC
> without wiring the extraction IRQ line to the ARM GIC. So, if we want to
> be notified of any PTP packets received on the CPU port module, we have
> a problem.
>
> There is a possible workaround, which is to use the Ethernet CPU port as
> a notification channel that packets are available on the CPU port module
> as well. When a PTP packet is received by the DSA tagger (without timestamp,
> of course), we go to the CPU extraction queues, poll for it there, then
> we drop the original Ethernet packet and masquerade the packet retrieved
> over MMIO (plus the timestamp) as the original when we inject it up the
> stack.
>
> Create a quirk in struct felix is selected by the Felix driver (but not
> by Seville, since that doesn't support PTP at all). We want to do this
> such that the workaround is minimally invasive for future switches that
> don't require this workaround.
>
> The only traffic for which we need timestamps is PTP traffic, so add a
> redirection rule to the CPU port module for this. Currently we only have
> the need for PTP over L2, so redirection rules for UDP ports 319 and 320
> are TBD for now.
>
> Note that for the workaround of matching of PTP-over-Ethernet-port with
> PTP-over-MMIO queues to work properly, both channels need to be
> absolutely lossless. There are two parts to achieving that:
> - We keep flow control enabled on the tag_8021q CPU port
> - We put the DSA master interface in promiscuous mode, so it will never
> drop a PTP frame (for the profiles we are interested in, these are
> sent to the multicast MAC addresses of 01-80-c2-00-00-0e and
> 01-1b-19-00-00-00).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:464:12: warning: variable ‘err’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
464 | int port, err;
| ^~~
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:265:53: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:265:53: expected unsigned short [usertype]
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:265:53: got restricted __be16 [usertype]
Please build test the patches locally, the patchwork testing thing is
not keeping up with the volume, and it's running on the largest VM
available thru the provider already :/
I need to add this "don't post your patches to get them build tested
or you'll make Kuba very angry" to the netdev FAQ.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists