[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ac09d0f99a9f7ba1bdfa933eb5fc08740dd0346c.1611637639.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:10:49 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
pabeni@...hat.com, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/2] rxrpc: call udp_tunnel_encap_enable in rxrpc_open_socket
When doing encap_enable/increasing encap_needed_key, up->encap_enabled
is not set in rxrpc_open_socket(), and it will cause encap_needed_key
not being decreased in udpv6_destroy_sock().
This patch is to improve it by just calling udp_tunnel_encap_enable()
where it increases both UDP and UDPv6 encap_needed_key and sets
up->encap_enabled.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/rxrpc/local_object.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
index 8c28810..93e05d2 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
@@ -135,11 +135,7 @@ static int rxrpc_open_socket(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct net *net)
udp_sk(usk)->gro_receive = NULL;
udp_sk(usk)->gro_complete = NULL;
- udp_encap_enable();
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_IPV6)
- if (local->srx.transport.family == AF_INET6)
- udpv6_encap_enable();
-#endif
+ udp_tunnel_encap_enable(local->socket);
usk->sk_error_report = rxrpc_error_report;
/* if a local address was supplied then bind it */
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists