[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210126215519.5xycqxrdavtpa2vx@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 23:55:19 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use
mv88e6185_g1_vtu_loadpurge() for the 6250
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:04:49PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Apart from the mask used to get the high bits of the fid,
> mv88e6185_g1_vtu_loadpurge() and mv88e6250_g1_vtu_loadpurge() are
> identical. Since the entry->fid passed in should never exceed the
> number of databases, we can simply use the former as-is as replacement
> for the latter.
>
> Suggested-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists