| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b0f27756-1d9f-3562-844c-85c85c20fc6c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:35:35 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: "Schmid, Carsten" <Carsten_Schmid@...tor.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible race in ipv4 routing
On 2/1/21 2:20 AM, Schmid, Carsten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on kernel 4.14(.147) i have seen something weird. The stack trace:
>
> [65064.457920] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000604
> [65064.466677] IP: ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x755/0x850
> [65064.472599] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [65064.475422] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [65064.480277] Modules linked in: bcmdhd(O) nls_cp437 nls_utf8 ebt_ip6 ebt_ip ebtable_filter ebtables squashfs zlib_inflate xz_dec veth lzo lzo_compress lzo_decompress nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp850 vfat fat cfq_iosched sd_mod ah4 esp4 xfrm4_mode_transport tntfs(PO) texfat(PO) usb_storage xfrm_user xfrm_algo cls_u32 cdc_acm sch_htb intel_tfm_governor snd_soc_apl_mgu_hu ecryptfs intel_xhci_usb_role_switch roles dwc3 udc_core intel_ipu4_psys intel_ipu4_psys_csslib adv728x coretemp snd_soc_skl intel_ipu4_isys videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops sdw_cnl ipu4_acpi snd_soc_acpi_intel_match intel_ipu4_isys_csslib videobuf2_v4l2 snd_soc_acpi videobuf2_core sbi_apl i2c_i801 snd_soc_core snd_compress snd_soc_skl_ipc sdw_bus xhci_pci crc8 ahci snd_soc_sst_ipc xhci_hcd libahci snd_soc_sst_dsp cfg80211 snd_hda_ext_core
> [65064.559290] libata snd_hda_core intel_ipu4_mmu usbcore rfkill usb_common snd_pcm scsi_mod dwc3_pci snd_timer mei_me snd intel_ipu4 soundcore mei iova nfsd auth_rpcgss lockd grace sunrpc zram zsmalloc loop fuse 8021q bridge stp llc inap560t(O) i915 video backlight intel_gtt i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper drm firmware_class igb_avb(O) ptp hwmon pps_core spi_pxa2xx_platform [last unloaded: bcmdhd]
> [65064.598123] CPU: 0 PID: 249 Comm: 6310_io01 Tainted: P U O 4.14.147-apl #1
> [65064.606860] task: ffff96e9f19a3200 task.stack: ffffb3cb80450000
> [65064.613465] RIP: 0010:ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x755/0x850
> [65064.619859] Blocking unknown connection: IN= OUT=wlan_bridge SRC=172.16.222.97 DST=224.0.0.22 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=1 ID=0 DF PROTO=2 MARK=0x1000d4
> [65064.619972] RSP: 0018:ffffb3cb80453940 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [65064.641436] RAX: ffff96e866eebf00 RBX: ffff96e800e5a238 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [65064.649397] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000026c730a0 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [65064.657363] RBP: ffffb3cb80453990 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96e9f5bdf000
> [65064.665326] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff96e875740540 R12: ffff96e866eebf00
> [65064.673290] R13: ffffb3cb804539a0 R14: ffff96e9f1ba7000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [65064.681252] FS: 00007efc327fc700(0000) GS:ffff96e9fdc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [65064.690284] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [65064.696697] CR2: 0000000000000604 CR3: 00000001f4d44000 CR4: 00000000003406b0
> [65064.704653] Call Trace:
> [65064.707384] ip_route_output_key_hash+0x82/0xb0
> [65064.712438] ip_route_output_flow+0x19/0x50
> [65064.717104] ip_queue_xmit+0x389/0x3c0
> [65064.721286] __tcp_transmit_skb+0x598/0x9f0
> [65064.725956] tcp_write_xmit+0x1ab/0xf40
> [65064.730234] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x30/0xd0
> [65064.735387] tcp_push+0xe7/0x110
> [65064.738985] tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x9a3/0xe40
> [65064.743652] tcp_sendmsg+0x27/0x40
> [65064.747444] inet_sendmsg+0x2f/0xf0
> [65064.751332] sock_sendmsg+0x31/0x40
> [65064.755221] ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x2a0
> [65064.759500] ? do_iter_readv_writev+0x103/0x160
> [65064.764557] ? try_to_wake_up+0x25c/0x460
> [65064.769024] ? default_wake_function+0xd/0x10
> [65064.773893] ? __wake_up_common+0x6e/0x120
> [65064.778460] ? __fget+0x71/0xa0
> [65064.781962] __sys_sendmsg+0x4f/0x90
> [65064.785946] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x4f/0x90
> [65064.790125] SyS_sendmsg+0x9/0x10
> [65064.793818] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x350
> [65064.797900] ? schedule+0x2e/0x90
> [65064.801594] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0x5a/0x90
> [65064.806549] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
> [65064.812183] RIP: 0033:0x7efc3c549807
> [65064.816167] RSP: 002b:00007efc327f9500 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> [65064.824616] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000233 RCX: 00007efc3c549807
> [65064.832575] RDX: 0000000000004000 RSI: 00007efc327f9570 RDI: 0000000000000233
> [65064.840543] RBP: 00007efc327f9570 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
> [65064.848500] R10: 00007efc2c087548 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000004000
> [65064.856459] R13: 0000000000000233 R14: 00007efc327fc5c0 R15: 00007efc24bf7810
> [65064.864419] Code: b1 72 e9 bc fe ff ff 4c 89 4d c8 4c 89 45 d0 e8 a2 08 be ff 4c 8b 45 d0 4c 8b 4d c8 e9 88 fa ff ff 48 8b 08 48 8b 89 98 04 00 00 <8b> 89 04 06 00 00 39 88 a0 00 00 00 0f 85 9c fe ff ff 8b 80 80
> [65064.885531] RIP: ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x755/0x850 RSP: ffffb3cb80453940
> [65064.893689] CR2: 0000000000000604
>
> Fortunately i have a core dump, and analyzed that.
> Finally in the analysis i came to that point:
> (net/ipv4/route.c around line 1520):
>
> static bool rt_cache_valid(const struct rtable *rt)
> {
> returnrt &&
> rt->dst.obsolete == DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK &&
> !rt_is_expired(rt); <<<< crash here, see below
> }
>
> The code was executing to the check !rt_is_expired(rt); and the disassembly looks like
> ffffffff814f1ba0:48 85 c0 test rax,rax // (1127, check for rt not NULL)
> ffffffff814f1ba3:74 0e je ffffffff814f1bb3 <ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x603>
> /usr/src/kernel/net/ipv4/route.c:1524
> ffffffff814f1ba5:66 83 78 64 ff cmp WORD PTR [rax+0x64],0xffff // rt->dst.obsolete accessed
> __mkroute_output():
>
> /usr/src/kernel/net/ipv4/route.c:2276
> rth = rcu_dereference(*prth);
> ffffffff814f1baa:49 89 c4 mov r12,rax // r12= rt
> rt_cache_valid():
> /usr/src/kernel/net/ipv4/route.c:1524
> ffffffff814f1bad:0f 84 48 01 00 00 je ffffffff814f1cfb <ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x74b> goes to ***1***
>
> the only reference reaching this point is after the DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK above:
> read_pnet():
> /usr/src/kernel/include/net/net_namespace.h:282
> ffffffff814f1cfb:48 8b 08 mov rcx,QWORD PTR [rax] <<<<<<***1*** need to come in here because previous instruction is a "jmp"
> fetches net_device *dev into rcx, value is ffff96e866eeb000
>
> ffffffff814f1cfe:48 8b 89 98 04 00 00 mov rcx,QWORD PTR [rcx+0x498]
> crash> rd 0xffff96e866eeb490 4
> ffff96e866eeb490: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ................ that's a NULL pointer here
> ffff96e866eeb4a0: 8000000000025287 0000000000010002 .R..............
> crash>__read_once_size():
> /usr/src/kernel/include/linux/compiler.h:183
> ffffffff814f1d05:8b 89 04 06 00 00 mov ecx,DWORD PTR [rcx+0x604] <<<<<<***** crash here. rcx = NULL, offset 0x604
>
> Looking at the data i can see that dst.obsolete=0x0002 (i ordered the memdump into the struct), so why did we reach that point?
> R12 = rt = ffff96e866eebf00 = struct rtable
> SIZE: 216
> struct rtable {
> [0x0] struct dst_entry dst;
> struct dst_entry {
> [0x0] struct net_device *dev; ffff96e866eeb000
> [0x8] struct callback_head callback_head;
> struct callback_head {
> [0x0] struct callback_head *next; 0000000000000000
> [0x8] void (*func)(struct callback_head *); 0101003800000500
> }
> SIZE: 0x10
> [0x18] struct dst_entry *child; 0000000000000000
> [0x20] struct dst_ops *ops; ffffffff8dcb28c0
> [0x28] unsigned long _metrics; ffffffff8da66d41
> [0x30] unsigned long expires; 0000000000000000
> [0x38] struct dst_entry *path; ffff96e866eebf00
> [0x40] struct dst_entry *from; 0000000000000000
> [0x48] struct xfrm_state *xfrm; 0000000000000000
> [0x50] int (*input)(struct sk_buff *); ffffffff8d49f640
> [0x58] int (*output)(struct net *, struct sock *, struct sk_buff *);ffffffff8d49f6d0
> [0x60] unsigned short flags; 0000
> [0x62] short error; 0000
> [0x64] short obsolete; 0002 <<<< we have not ffff here, but 0x02
> [0x66] unsigned short header_len; 0000
> [0x68] unsigned short trailer_len; 0000
> [0x6a] unsigned short __pad3; 0000
> [0x6c] __u32 __pad2; 00000000
> [0x70] long __pad_to_align_refcnt[2]; 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [0x80] atomic_t __refcnt; 000000000
> [0x84] int __use; 000000000
> [0x88] unsigned long lastuse; 0000000103dc0d11
> [0x90] struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate; 0000000000000000
> union {
> [0x98] struct dst_entry *next; 0000000000000000
> [0x98] struct rtable *rt_next;
> [0x98] struct rt6_info *rt6_next;
> [0x98] struct dn_route *dn_next;
> };
> }
> SIZE: 0xa0
> --- snip ---
>
> crash> rd 0xffff96e866eebf00 32 (=r12=rt)
> ffff96e866eebf00: ffff96e866eeb000 0000000000000000 ...f............
> ffff96e866eebf10: 0101003800000500 0000000000000000 ....8...........
> ffff96e866eebf20: ffffffff8dcb28c0 ffffffff8da66d41 .(......Am......
> ffff96e866eebf30: 0000000000000000 ffff96e866eebf00 ...........f....
> ffff96e866eebf40: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ................
> ffff96e866eebf50: ffffffff8d49f640 ffffffff8d49f6d0 @.I.......I.....
> ffff96e866eebf60: 0000000200000000 0000000000000000 ................ <-- here is the "obsolete"
> ffff96e866eebf70: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ................
> ffff96e866eebf80: 0000000000000000 0000000103dc0d11 ................
> ffff96e866eebf90: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ................
> ffff96e866eebfa0: 0000000000025287 0000000000000001 .R..............
> ffff96e866eebfb0: 0000000000000000 00000000000000fe ................
> ffff96e866eebfc0: ffff96e866eebfc0 ffff96e866eebfc0 ...f.......f....
> ffff96e866eebfd0: ffff96e8388dfc00 ffff96e8388dfc82 ...8.......8....
>
> Looks like a race somewhere, but i am not familiar with the TCPIP code.
> What i have found is a patch that was submitted for 4.14 and could have somethig to do with that:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable-commits/msg133055.html
> But this patch didn't make it into 4.14.
>
> Can someone check this race condition?
>
dst->dev is NULL. Adding author of the patch for thoughts.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists