[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCO+NCjissLTG1H6@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:06:28 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Dmytro Linkin <dlinkin@...dia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check
The mlx5_chains_get_table() function doesn't return NULL, it returns
error pointers so we need to fix this condition.
Fixes: 34ca65352ddf ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Indirect table infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
This applies to net-next but it might actually go through a different
tree before going to net? I don't know how this works...
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
index b7d00c4c7046..6f6772bf61a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/indir_table.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int mlx5_esw_indir_table_rule_get(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
flow_act.flags = FLOW_ACT_IGNORE_FLOW_LEVEL | FLOW_ACT_NO_APPEND;
dest.type = MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_FLOW_TABLE;
dest.ft = mlx5_chains_get_table(chains, 0, 1, 0);
- if (!dest.ft) {
+ if (IS_ERR(dest.ft)) {
err = PTR_ERR(dest.ft);
goto err_table;
}
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists