[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_C7Kz13ocAMJNvys_VcLdCHUG7usT4AgOk8ODbxrWQ=8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:07:27 -0800
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 0/3] implement kthread based napi poll
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:34 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 11:34 -0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > The idea of moving the napi poll process out of softirq context to a
> > kernel thread based context is not new.
> > Paolo Abeni and Hannes Frederic Sowa have proposed patches to move napi
> > poll to kthread back in 2016. And Felix Fietkau has also proposed
> > patches of similar ideas to use workqueue to process napi poll just a
> > few weeks ago.
>
> I'd like to explicitly thank Wei and the reviewers for all the effort
> done to get this merged!
>
> Nice and huge work, kudos on you!
Thank you Paolo! And thanks to all the reviewers!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists