[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171e77b1-b58b-9c62-3082-c40c80bc9240@novek.ru>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:12:57 +0000
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] rxrpc: Fix dependency on IPv6 in udp tunnel config
On 09.02.2021 13:54, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> As udp_port_cfg struct changes its members with dependency on IPv6
> configuration, the code in rxrpc should also check for IPv6.
Looks like this patch was mistakely tagged as superseded by
dc0e6056decc rxrpc: Fix missing dependency on NET_UDP_TUNNEL
Although both patches have the same Fixes tag, this one fixes
different problem - rxrpc subsystem could not be compiled without
support for IPv6 because the code tries to access ipv6-specific
members of struct udp_port_cfg.
Should I resend it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists