lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171e77b1-b58b-9c62-3082-c40c80bc9240@novek.ru>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:12:57 +0000
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] rxrpc: Fix dependency on IPv6 in udp tunnel config

On 09.02.2021 13:54, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> As udp_port_cfg struct changes its members with dependency on IPv6
> configuration, the code in rxrpc should also check for IPv6.

Looks like this patch was mistakely tagged as superseded by
dc0e6056decc rxrpc: Fix missing dependency on NET_UDP_TUNNEL
Although both patches have the same Fixes tag, this one fixes
different problem - rxrpc subsystem could not be compiled without
support for IPv6 because the code tries to access ipv6-specific
members of struct udp_port_cfg.

Should I resend it?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ