[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210211173805.217431ac@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:38:05 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] rxrpc: Fix dependency on IPv6 in udp tunnel config
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:12:57 +0000 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 09.02.2021 13:54, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > As udp_port_cfg struct changes its members with dependency on IPv6
> > configuration, the code in rxrpc should also check for IPv6.
>
> Looks like this patch was mistakely tagged as superseded by
> dc0e6056decc rxrpc: Fix missing dependency on NET_UDP_TUNNEL
> Although both patches have the same Fixes tag, this one fixes
> different problem - rxrpc subsystem could not be compiled without
> support for IPv6 because the code tries to access ipv6-specific
> members of struct udp_port_cfg.
It does happen sometimes, it's the patchwork bot marking things as
superseded :(
> Should I resend it?
Yes, that'd probably be easiest for Dave to handle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists