lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23cc0f12-34a8-7a56-0bba-82bd4b2d3a44@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:57:53 +0200
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
        Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/10] net: bridge: offload all port flags at
 once in br_setport

On 12/02/2021 17:15, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> If for example this command:
> 
> ip link set swp0 type bridge_slave flood off mcast_flood off learning off
> 
> succeeded at configuring BR_FLOOD and BR_MCAST_FLOOD but not at
> BR_LEARNING, there would be no attempt to revert the partial state in
> any way. Arguably, if the user changes more than one flag through the
> same netlink command, this one _should_ be all or nothing, which means
> it should be passed through switchdev as all or nothing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> None.
> 
> Changes in v4:
> Leave br->lock alone completely.
> 
> Changes in v3:
> Don't attempt to drop br->lock around br_switchdev_set_port_flag now,
> move that part to a later patch.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> Patch is new.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> Patch is new.
> 
>  net/bridge/br_netlink.c   | 109 ++++++++++++--------------------------
>  net/bridge/br_switchdev.c |   6 ++-
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 

LGTM, thanks!
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ