[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210211172856.3d913519@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:28:56 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
stranche@...eaurora.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: Refcount mismatch when unregistering netdevice from kernel
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:21:26 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:11 AM Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:58 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/4/21 8:05 PM, stranche@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > Ah, I see now. rt6_flush_exceptions is called by fib6_del_route, but
> > > that won't handle replace.
> > >
> > > If you look at fib6_purge_rt it already has a call to remove pcpu
> > > entries. This call to flush exceptions should go there and the existing
> > > one in fib6_del_route can be removed.
> > >
> > Thanks for catching this!
> > Agree with this proposed fix.
>
> Looks like this fix never landed?
> Is it still needed or there was an alternative fix merged?
Wasn't it:
d8f5c29653c3 ("net: ipv6: fib: flush exceptions when purging route")
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists