netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Real time/free running timestamp support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:09:20 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Real time/free running timestamp support

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:10 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > 
> > Add an extra timestamp format for mlx5_ib device.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Aharon Landau (2):
> >   net/mlx5: Add new timestamp mode bits
> >   RDMA/mlx5: Fail QP creation if the device can not support the CQE
> > TS
> > 
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c | 104
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h   |  54 +++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Since this is a rdma series, and we are at the end of the cycle, I
> took the IFC file directly to the rdma tree instead of through the
> shared branch.
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks
> 

mmm, i was planing to resubmit this patch with the netdev real time
support series, since the uplink representor is getting delayed, I
thought I could submit the real time stuff today. can you wait on the
ifc patch, i will re-send it today if you will, but it must go through
the shared branch

Thanks.