[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212211408.GA1860468@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:14:08 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Real time/free running timestamp support
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:09:20PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:10 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > Add an extra timestamp format for mlx5_ib device.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Aharon Landau (2):
> > > net/mlx5: Add new timestamp mode bits
> > > RDMA/mlx5: Fail QP creation if the device can not support the CQE
> > > TS
> > >
> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c | 104
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 54 +++++++++++++++--
> > > 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > Since this is a rdma series, and we are at the end of the cycle, I
> > took the IFC file directly to the rdma tree instead of through the
> > shared branch.
> >
> > Applied to for-next, thanks
> >
>
> mmm, i was planing to resubmit this patch with the netdev real time
> support series, since the uplink representor is getting delayed, I
> thought I could submit the real time stuff today. can you wait on the
> ifc patch, i will re-send it today if you will, but it must go through
> the shared branch
Friday of rc7 is a bit late to be sending new patches for the first
time, isn't it??
But sure, if you update the shared branch right now I'll fix up rdma.git
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists