netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Real time/free running timestamp support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53a97eb379af167c0221408a07c9bddc6624027d.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:19:09 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Real time/free running timestamp support

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 17:14 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:09:20PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:10 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add an extra timestamp format for mlx5_ib device.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > 
> > > > Aharon Landau (2):
> > > >   net/mlx5: Add new timestamp mode bits
> > > >   RDMA/mlx5: Fail QP creation if the device can not support the
> > > > CQE
> > > > TS
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c | 104
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h   |  54 +++++++++++++++--
> > > >  2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Since this is a rdma series, and we are at the end of the cycle,
> > > I
> > > took the IFC file directly to the rdma tree instead of through
> > > the
> > > shared branch.
> > > 
> > > Applied to for-next, thanks
> > > 
> > 
> > mmm, i was planing to resubmit this patch with the netdev real time
> > support series, since the uplink representor is getting delayed, I
> > thought I could submit the real time stuff today. can you wait on
> > the
> > ifc patch, i will re-send it today if you will, but it must go
> > through
> > the shared branch
> 
> Friday of rc7 is a bit late to be sending new patches for the first
> time, isn't it??

I know, uplink representor last minute mess !

> 
> But sure, if you update the shared branch right now I'll fix up
> rdma.git
> 

I can't put it in the shared brach without review, i will post it to
the netdev/rdma lists for two days at least for review and feedback.

Not critical though, this can wait for next rc1.. if you want to
proceed with what you already did.

Thanks