[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210215114822.4f698920@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:48:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: <vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com>
Cc: <richardcochran@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] ptp: ptp_clockmatrix: Add
wait_for_sys_apll_dpll_lock.
On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:06:04 -0500 vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com wrote:
> From: Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com>
>
> Part of the device initialization aligns the rising edge of the output
> clock to the internal 1 PPS clock. If the system APLL and DPLL is not
> locked, then the alignment will fail and there will be a fixed offset
> between the internal 1 PPS clock and the output clock.
>
> After loading the device firmware, poll the system APLL and DPLL for
> locked state prior to initialization, timing out after 2 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@...esas.com>
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/idt8a340_reg.h b/drivers/ptp/idt8a340_reg.h
> index a664dfe..ac524cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/idt8a340_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/idt8a340_reg.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@
> #define OTP_SCSR_CONFIG_SELECT 0x0022
>
> #define STATUS 0xc03c
> +#define DPLL_SYS_STATUS 0x0020
> +#define DPLL_SYS_APLL_STATUS 0x0021
> #define USER_GPIO0_TO_7_STATUS 0x008a
> #define USER_GPIO8_TO_15_STATUS 0x008b
>
> @@ -707,4 +709,12 @@
> /* Bit definitions for the DPLL_CTRL_COMBO_MASTER_CFG register */
> #define COMBO_MASTER_HOLD BIT(0)
>
> +/* Bit definitions for DPLL_SYS_STATUS register */
> +#define DPLL_SYS_STATE_MASK (0xf)
> +
> +/* Bit definitions for SYS_APLL_STATUS register */
> +#define SYS_APLL_LOSS_LOCK_LIVE_MASK BIT(0)
> +#define SYS_APLL_LOSS_LOCK_LIVE_LOCKED 0
> +#define SYS_APLL_LOSS_LOCK_LIVE_UNLOCKED 1
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.c
> index 051511f..3de8411 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,79 @@ static int wait_for_boot_status_ready(struct idtcm *idtcm)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> +static int read_sys_apll_status(struct idtcm *idtcm, u8 *status)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = idtcm_read(idtcm, STATUS, DPLL_SYS_APLL_STATUS, status,
> + sizeof(u8));
> + return err;
Please remove the unnecessary 'err' variable:
return idtcm_read(..
There are bots scanning the tree for such code simplifications,
better to get this right from the start than deal with flood of
simplifications patches.
> +}
> +
> +static int read_sys_dpll_status(struct idtcm *idtcm, u8 *status)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = idtcm_read(idtcm, STATUS, DPLL_SYS_STATUS, status, sizeof(u8));
> +
> + return err;
same here
> +}
> +
> +static int wait_for_sys_apll_dpll_lock(struct idtcm *idtcm)
> +{
> + const char *fmt = "%d ms SYS lock timeout: APLL Loss Lock %d DPLL state %d";
> + u8 i = LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS / LOCK_POLL_INTERVAL_MS;
Using msleep() and loops is quite inaccurate. I'd recommend you switch
to:
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
And then use:
while (time_is_after_jiffies(timeout))
For the condition.
> + u8 apll = 0;
> + u8 dpll = 0;
> +
> + int err;
No empty lines between variables, please.
> +
> + do {
> + err = read_sys_apll_status(idtcm, &apll);
> +
No empty lines between call and the if, please.
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = read_sys_dpll_status(idtcm, &dpll);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + apll &= SYS_APLL_LOSS_LOCK_LIVE_MASK;
> + dpll &= DPLL_SYS_STATE_MASK;
> +
> + if ((apll == SYS_APLL_LOSS_LOCK_LIVE_LOCKED)
parenthesis around a == b are unnecessary.
> + && (dpll == DPLL_STATE_LOCKED)) {
> + return 0;
> + } else if ((dpll == DPLL_STATE_FREERUN) ||
> + (dpll == DPLL_STATE_HOLDOVER) ||
> + (dpll == DPLL_STATE_OPEN_LOOP)) {
same here.
> + dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev,
> + "No wait state: DPLL_SYS_STATE %d", dpll);
It looks like other prints in this function use \n at the end of the
lines, should we keep it consistent?
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + msleep(LOCK_POLL_INTERVAL_MS);
> + i--;
> +
unnecessary empty line
> + } while (i);
> +
> + dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev, fmt, LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS, apll, dpll);
I'd recommend leaving the format in place, that way static code
checkers can validate the arguments.
> + return -ETIME;
> +}
> +
> +static void wait_for_chip_ready(struct idtcm *idtcm)
> +{
> + if (wait_for_boot_status_ready(idtcm))
> + dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev, "BOOT_STATUS != 0xA0");
no new line?
> +
> + if (wait_for_sys_apll_dpll_lock(idtcm))
> + dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev,
> + "Continuing while SYS APLL/DPLL is not locked");
And here.
> +}
> +
> static int _idtcm_gettime(struct idtcm_channel *channel,
> struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> @@ -2235,8 +2308,7 @@ static int idtcm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev,
> "loading firmware failed with %d\n", err);
>
> - if (wait_for_boot_status_ready(idtcm))
> - dev_warn(&idtcm->client->dev, "BOOT_STATUS != 0xA0\n");
> + wait_for_chip_ready(idtcm);
>
> if (idtcm->tod_mask) {
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_TOD; i++) {
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.h b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.h
> index 645de2c..0233236 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.h
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clockmatrix.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
> #define TOD_WRITE_OVERHEAD_COUNT_MAX (2)
> #define TOD_BYTE_COUNT (11)
>
> +#define LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS (2000)
> +#define LOCK_POLL_INTERVAL_MS (10)
> +
> #define PEROUT_ENABLE_OUTPUT_MASK (0xdeadbeef)
>
> #define IDTCM_MAX_WRITE_COUNT (512)
> @@ -105,6 +108,18 @@ enum scsr_tod_write_type_sel {
> SCSR_TOD_WR_TYPE_SEL_MAX = SCSR_TOD_WR_TYPE_SEL_DELTA_MINUS,
> };
>
> +/* Values STATUS.DPLL_SYS_STATUS.DPLL_SYS_STATE */
> +enum dpll_state {
> + DPLL_STATE_MIN = 0,
> + DPLL_STATE_FREERUN = DPLL_STATE_MIN,
> + DPLL_STATE_LOCKACQ = 1,
> + DPLL_STATE_LOCKREC = 2,
> + DPLL_STATE_LOCKED = 3,
> + DPLL_STATE_HOLDOVER = 4,
> + DPLL_STATE_OPEN_LOOP = 5,
> + DPLL_STATE_MAX = DPLL_STATE_OPEN_LOOP,
> +};
> +
> struct idtcm;
>
> struct idtcm_channel {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists