[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210215115114.1a16ad42@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:51:14 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, secdev@...lsio.com,
varun@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] cxgb4/chtls/cxgbit: Keeping the max ofld immediate
data size same in cxgb4 and ulds
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 17:12:26 +0530 Ayush Sawal wrote:
> The Max imm data size in cxgb4 is not similar to the max imm data size
> in the chtls. This caused an mismatch in output of is_ofld_imm() of
> cxgb4 and chtls. So fixed this by keeping the max wreq size of imm data
> same in both chtls and cxgb4 as MAX_IMM_OFLD_TX_DATA_WR_LEN.
>
> As cxgb4's max imm. data value for ofld packets is changed to
> MAX_IMM_OFLD_TX_DATA_WR_LEN. Using the same in cxgbit also.
>
> Fixes: 36bedb3f2e5b8 ("crypto: chtls - Inline TLS record Tx")
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists