[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VetyEo6+KhWm=h3iCSfRS6KGFXR4fOHE3KA9sWcwZsXrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:52:04 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 07/15] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:28 AM Calvin Johnson
<calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() to register PHYs on the
> mdiobus. From the compatible string, identify whether the PHY is
> c45 and based on this create a PHY device instance which is
> registered on the mdiobus.
Thanks for an update!
Below some nit-picks, may be ignored.
> uninitialized symbol 'mii_ts'
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
I don't think the above deserves to be in the commit message (rather
after the cutter '---' line as a changelog).
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
...
> + if (mii_ts)
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
...
> + if (mii_ts)
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
I'm wondering if we can move this check to the
unregister_mii_timestamper() to make it NULL aware as many other
similar (unregister) APIs do. I have checked that there are currently
three users of this that can benefit of the change.
...
> + /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> + * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> + * precedence.
> + */
> + if (mii_ts)
> + phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
I'm wondering if the belo form is better to read
phy->mii_ts = mii_ts ?: phy->mii_ts;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists