netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-rc] rdma: Fix statistics bind/unbing argument handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:44:16 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Ido Kalir <idok@...dia.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-rc] rdma: Fix statistics bind/unbing argument
 handling

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:48:24AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/15/21 11:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:56:26PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 2/14/21 10:40 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 08:26:16PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >>>> what does iproute2-rc mean?
> >>>
> >>> Patch target is iproute2.git:
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/
> >>
> >> so you are asking them to be committed for the 5.11 release?
> >
> > This is a Fix to an existing issue (not theoretical one), so I was under
> > impression that it should go to -rc repo and not to -next.
>
> It is assigned to Stephen for iproute2.
>
> >
> > Personally, I don't care to which repo will this fix be applied as long
> > as it is applied to one of the two iproute2 official repos.
> >
> > Do you have clear guidance when should I send patches to iproute2-rc/iproute2-next?
> >
>
> It's the rc label that needs to be dropped: iproute2 or iproute2-next.

Sure, no problem.

Thanks