[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210222192306.400c6a50@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:23:06 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the
net-next tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:53:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:26:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 19d9a846d9fc ("dt-binding: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: update bindings for am64x cpsw3g")
> >
> > from the net-next tree and commit:
> >
> > 0499220d6dad ("dt-bindings: Add missing array size constraints")
> >
> > from the devicetree tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > index 3fae9a5f0c6a,097c5cc6c853..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > @@@ -72,7 -66,8 +72,8 @@@ properties
> > dma-coherent: true
> >
> > clocks:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > - description: CPSW2G NUSS functional clock
> > + description: CPSWxG NUSS functional clock
> >
> > clock-names:
> > items:
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.
This is now a conflict between the devicetree tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists