[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbddedcf-fa9b-95bd-1e10-5a46da88f305@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:35:10 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the net-next
tree
On 22/02/2021 10:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:53:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:26:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>> 19d9a846d9fc ("dt-binding: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: update bindings for am64x cpsw3g")
>>>
>>> from the net-next tree and commit:
>>>
>>> 0499220d6dad ("dt-bindings: Add missing array size constraints")
>>>
>>> from the devicetree tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>> complex conflicts.
>>>
>>> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>>> index 3fae9a5f0c6a,097c5cc6c853..000000000000
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>>> @@@ -72,7 -66,8 +72,8 @@@ properties
>>> dma-coherent: true
>>>
>>> clocks:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> - description: CPSW2G NUSS functional clock
>>> + description: CPSWxG NUSS functional clock
>>>
>>> clock-names:
>>> items:
>>
>> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
>> conflict still exists.
>
> This is now a conflict between the devicetree tree and Linus' tree.
>
Sorry for inconvenience, is there anything I can do to help resolve it?
(Changes went through a different trees)
--
Best regards,
grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists