netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YDy1j+hMLGUWKKV6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:36:15 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, mingo@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        will@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> Shuah Khan (3):
> >>   lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
> >>   lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
> >>   ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
> >
> > Thanks!
> 
> Via which tree should these go?

I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
when the robots don't hate on it.

Does that work for you?