netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:02:04 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kuba@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> >> Shuah Khan (3):
>> >>   lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
>> >>   lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
>> >>   ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> 
>> Via which tree should these go?
>
> I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
> when the robots don't hate on it.
>
> Does that work for you?

That's perfect, thanks! Just making sure that the patches don't get
lost.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches