netdev - RE: [PATCH v10 01/20] dlb: add skeleton for DLB driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 04:53:15 +0000
From:   "Chen, Mike Ximing" <mike.ximing.chen@...el.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        "Laatz, Kevin" <kevin.laatz@...el.com>,
        "maximmi@...lanox.com" <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 01/20] dlb: add skeleton for DLB driver


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:00:00PM +0000, Chen, Mike Ximing wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > While waiting for the feedback from the networking maintainers, I am
> > wondering if you have any other comments/suggestions that I  should address
> > in parallel.
> 
> It's in my "to-review" queue, which is huge at the moment.  But the
> networking developers review will determine how this should go forward,
> so I'll just wait for them to get to it.
> 

I see the status of the submission (to netdev)  is now marked as "Not Applicable" 
at netdev's patchwork site
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=&submitter=197673&state=*&q=&archive=both&delegate=

Looks like that the patch set is considered as not being networking related. (?)

Thanks
Mike