[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEknweta9TXcw1l5@unreal>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:10:41 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v7 0/4] Dynamically assign MSI-X vectors count
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> > > to the series, because you liked v6 more.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Changelog
> > > v7:
> > > * Rebase on top v5.12-rc1
> > > * More english fixes
> > > * Returned to static sysfs creation model as was implemented in v0/v1.
<...>
> 2) Should a VF sysfs file use the PF to implement this?
>
> Can you elaborate on your idea here? I guess
> pci_iov_sysfs_link() makes a "virtfnX" link from the PF to the
> VF, and you're thinking we could also make a "virtfnX_msix_count"
> in the PF directory? That's a really interesting idea.
I want to remind that we are talking about mlx5 devices that support
upto 255 VFs and they indeed are used to their limits. So seeing 255
links of virtfnX_msix_count in the same directory looks too much unpleasant
to me.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists