netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v7 0/4] Dynamically assign MSI-X vectors count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YEkqY5ZJLXp8dork@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:21:55 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v7 0/4] Dynamically assign MSI-X vectors count

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:55:24AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:55 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > > >
> > > > @Alexander Duyck, please update me if I can add your ROB tag again
> > > > to the series, because you liked v6 more.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Changelog
> > > > v7:
> > > >  * Rebase on top v5.12-rc1
> > > >  * More english fixes
> > > >  * Returned to static sysfs creation model as was implemented in v0/v1.
> 
> <...>
> 
> >   2) Should a VF sysfs file use the PF to implement this?
> >
> >      Can you elaborate on your idea here?  I guess
> >      pci_iov_sysfs_link() makes a "virtfnX" link from the PF to the
> >      VF, and you're thinking we could also make a "virtfnX_msix_count"
> >      in the PF directory?  That's a really interesting idea.
> 
> I want to remind that we are talking about mlx5 devices that support
> upto 255 VFs and they indeed are used to their limits. So seeing 255
> links of virtfnX_msix_count in the same directory looks too much unpleasant
> to me.

255 files are nothing, if that's what the hardware supports, what is the
problem?  If it's "unpleasant", go complain to the hardware designers :)

greg k-h