[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9996b4ad-f92e-e088-fcb7-0babbe223237@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:43:25 +0200
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 6/9] RDMA/mlx5: Use represntor E-Switch when
getting netdev and metadata
On 3/11/21 7:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:09:12PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
>>
>> Now that a pointer to the managing E-Switch is stored in the representor
>> use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Spelling error in the subject
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c
>> index 25da0b05b4e2..01370d9a871a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c
>> @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void mlx5_ib_set_rule_source_port(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
>> misc_parameters_2);
>>
>> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc2, misc, metadata_reg_c_0,
>> - mlx5_eswitch_get_vport_metadata_for_match(esw,
>> + mlx5_eswitch_get_vport_metadata_for_match(rep->esw,
>> rep->vport));
>
> Why not change the esw reference above too?
The if that checks if metadata is enabled uses the eswitch that rule is going to be inserted to.
The representor has a pointer to the eswitch it was created on.
Mark
>
> Seems Ok otherwise
>
> Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
>
> Jason
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists