[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210325150115.138750-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:01:15 -0300
From: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix bail out from 'ringbuf_process_ring()' on error
The current code bails out with negative and positive returns.
If the callback returns a positive return code, 'ring_buffer__consume()'
and 'ring_buffer__poll()' will return a spurious number of records
consumed, but mostly important will continue the processing loop.
This patch makes positive returns from the callback a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
index 8caaafe7e312..e7a8d847161f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring* r)
if ((len & BPF_RINGBUF_DISCARD_BIT) == 0) {
sample = (void *)len_ptr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ;
err = r->sample_cb(r->ctx, sample, len);
- if (err) {
+ if (err < 0) {
/* update consumer pos and bail out */
smp_store_release(r->consumer_pos,
cons_pos);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists