[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzby2eo3-s86rgEjOESrQdemBjYsfLCv=WPh0UHTOZQ7Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:31:39 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...il.com>
Cc: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix bail out from 'ringbuf_process_ring()'
on error
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 8:02 AM Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The current code bails out with negative and positive returns.
> If the callback returns a positive return code, 'ring_buffer__consume()'
> and 'ring_buffer__poll()' will return a spurious number of records
> consumed, but mostly important will continue the processing loop.
>
> This patch makes positive returns from the callback a no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Thanks. Applied to bpf tree and added:
Fixes: bf99c936f947 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support")
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> index 8caaafe7e312..e7a8d847161f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring* r)
> if ((len & BPF_RINGBUF_DISCARD_BIT) == 0) {
> sample = (void *)len_ptr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ;
> err = r->sample_cb(r->ctx, sample, len);
> - if (err) {
> + if (err < 0) {
> /* update consumer pos and bail out */
> smp_store_release(r->consumer_pos,
> cons_pos);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists