[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210326.144955.2174747206015428638.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, paul.greenwalt@...el.com,
rajur@...lsio.com, jaroslawx.gawin@...el.com, vkochan@...vell.com,
alobakin@...me, snelson@...sando.io, shayagr@...zon.com,
ayal@...dia.com, shenjian15@...wei.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch, roopa@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] ethtool: clarify the ethtool FEC
interface
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:07:21 -0700
> Our FEC configuration interface is one of the more confusing.
> It also lacks any error checking in the core. This certainly
> shows in the varying implementations across the drivers.
>
> Improve the documentation and add most basic checks. Sadly, it's
> probably too late now to try to enforce much more uniformity.
>
> Any thoughts & suggestions welcome. Next step is to add netlink
> for FEC, then stats.
>
> v2:
> - fix patch 5
> - adjust kdoc in patches 3 and 6
Jakub, I applied v1 so please send fiixups relative to that, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists