netdev - [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix sk->prot unhash op reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:00:19 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...com
Cc:     john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, lmb@...udflare.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix sk->prot unhash op reset

In '4da6a196f93b1' we fixed a potential unhash loop caused when
a TLS socket in a sockmap was removed from the sockmap. This
happened because the unhash operation on the TLS ctx continued
to point at the sockmap implementation of unhash even though the
psock has already been removed. The sockmap unhash handler when a
psock is removed does the following,

 void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 {
	void (*saved_unhash)(struct sock *sk);
	struct sk_psock *psock;

	rcu_read_lock();
	psock = sk_psock(sk);
	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
		rcu_read_unlock();
		if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
			sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
		return;
	}
        [...]
 }

The unlikely() case is there to handle the case where psock is detached
but the proto ops have not been updated yet. But, in the above case
with TLS and removed psock we never fixed sk_prot->unhash() and unhash()
points back to sock_map_unhash resulting in a loop. To fix this we added
this bit of code,

 static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
                                          struct sk_psock *psock)
 {
       sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;

This will set the sk_prot->unhash back to its saved value. This is the
correct callback for a TLS socket that has been removed from the sock_map.
Unfortunately, this also overwrites the unhash pointer for all psocks.
We effectively break sockmap unhash handling for any future socks.
Omitting the unhash operation will leave stale entries in the map if
a socket transition through unhash, but does not do close() op.

To fix set unhash correctly before calling into tls_update. This way the
TLS enabled socket will point to the saved unhash() handler.

Fixes: 4da6a196f93b1 ("bpf: Sockmap/tls, during free we may call tcp_bpf_unhash() in loop")
Reported-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/skmsg.h |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index 8edbbf5f2f93..822c048934e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -349,8 +349,13 @@ static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk,
 static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
 					  struct sk_psock *psock)
 {
-	sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;
 	if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
+		/* TLS does not have an unhash proto in SW cases, but we need
+		 * to ensure we stop using the sock_map unhash routine because
+		 * the associated psock is being removed. So use the original
+		 * unhash handler.
+		 */
+		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot->unhash, psock->saved_unhash);
 		tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, psock->saved_write_space);
 	} else {
 		sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;