lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:34:59 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "Sit, Michael Wei Hong" <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
        "peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        "alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
        "qiangqing.zhang@....com" <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        "Wong, Vee Khee" <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>,
        "fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
        "Chuah, Kim Tatt" <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: enable 2.5Gbps link speed

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 07:45:04AM +0000, Voon, Weifeng wrote:
> > > +	/* 2.5G mode only support 2500baseT full duplex only */
> > > +	if (priv->plat->has_gmac4 && priv->plat->speed_2500_en) {
> > > +		phylink_set(mac_supported, 2500baseT_Full);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 10baseT_Half);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 10baseT_Full);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Half);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 100baseT_Full);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 1000baseT_Half);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 1000baseT_Full);
> > > +		phylink_set(mask, 1000baseKX_Full);
> > 
> > Why? This seems at odds to the comment above?
> 
> > What about 2500baseX_Full ?
> 
> The comments explain that the PCS<->PHY link is in 2500BASE-X
> and why 10/100/1000 link speed is mutually exclusive with 2500.
> But the connected external PHY are twisted pair cable which only
> supports 2500baseT_full.

The PHY should indicate what modes its supports. The PHY drivers
get_features() call should set supported to only 2500baseT_Full, if
that is all it supports.

What modes are actually used should then be the intersect of what both
the MAC and the PHY indicate they can do.

     Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ