[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210406191349.zunf27ijfp7hoq33@lion.mk-sys.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:13:49 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] ethtool: fix incorrect datatype in set_eee ops
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:17:30PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> The member 'tx_lpi_timer' is defined with __u32 datatype in the ethtool
> header file. Hence, we should use ethnl_update_u32() in set_eee ops.
To be precise, the correct reason is that unlike .eee_enabled and
.tx_lpi_enabled, .tx_lpi_timer value is interpreted as a number, not
a logical value (those two are also __u32). But I don't think it's
necessary to resubmit.
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> Fixes: fd77be7bd43c ("ethtool: set EEE settings with EEE_SET request")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10.x
> Cc: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> net/ethtool/eee.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/eee.c b/net/ethtool/eee.c
> index 901b7de941ab..e10bfcc07853 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/eee.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/eee.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ int ethnl_set_eee(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> ethnl_update_bool32(&eee.eee_enabled, tb[ETHTOOL_A_EEE_ENABLED], &mod);
> ethnl_update_bool32(&eee.tx_lpi_enabled,
> tb[ETHTOOL_A_EEE_TX_LPI_ENABLED], &mod);
> - ethnl_update_bool32(&eee.tx_lpi_timer, tb[ETHTOOL_A_EEE_TX_LPI_TIMER],
> - &mod);
> + ethnl_update_u32(&eee.tx_lpi_timer, tb[ETHTOOL_A_EEE_TX_LPI_TIMER],
> + &mod);
> ret = 0;
> if (!mod)
> goto out_ops;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists