[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHCZRAFL61LRpA9n@lore-desk>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:13:24 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, shayagr@...zon.com,
sameehj@...zon.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
brouer@...hat.com, echaudro@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 08/14] bpf: add multi-buff support to the
bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:15:47PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > + if (unlikely(offset > ((int)(xdp->data_end - xdp->data) +
> > > + xdp_sinfo->data_length -
> > > + ETH_HLEN)))
> >
> > Also: should we have some sort of helper for calculating the total
> > length of an xdp_frame (head + frags)? Maybe it's just me, but I find it
> > slightly confusing that xdp_sinfo->data_length does not account for
> > everything.
>
> I see now that xdp_buff :: frame_length is added in patch 10. It is a
> bit strange to not use it wherever you can? Could patch 10 be moved
> before patch 8?
yes, I agree we can change the patch order
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists