[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b541c88e-879e-ee9d-90d8-2cd37690f7e6@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:25:03 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: bridge: switchdev: refactor
br_switchdev_fdb_notify
On 14/04/2021 18:15, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
>
> Instead of having to add more and more arguments to
> br_switchdev_fdb_call_notifiers, get rid of it and build the info
> struct directly in br_switchdev_fdb_notify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 41 +++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
Hi,
Is there a PATCH 0/2 with overview and explanation of what's happening in this set ?
If there isn't one please add it and explain the motivation and the change.
Thanks,
Nik
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index 1e24d9a2c9a7..c390f84adea2 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -107,25 +107,16 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void
> -br_switchdev_fdb_call_notifiers(bool adding, const unsigned char *mac,
> - u16 vid, struct net_device *dev,
> - bool added_by_user, bool offloaded)
> -{
> - struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info;
> - unsigned long notifier_type;
> -
> - info.addr = mac;
> - info.vid = vid;
> - info.added_by_user = added_by_user;
> - info.offloaded = offloaded;
> - notifier_type = adding ? SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE : SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE;
> - call_switchdev_notifiers(notifier_type, dev, &info.info, NULL);
> -}
> -
> void
> br_switchdev_fdb_notify(const struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb, int type)
> {
> + struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info = {
> + .addr = fdb->key.addr.addr,
> + .vid = fdb->key.vlan_id,
> + .added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags),
> + .offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags),
> + };
> +
> if (!fdb->dst)
> return;
> if (test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags))
> @@ -133,22 +124,12 @@ br_switchdev_fdb_notify(const struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb, int type)
>
> switch (type) {
> case RTM_DELNEIGH:
> - br_switchdev_fdb_call_notifiers(false, fdb->key.addr.addr,
> - fdb->key.vlan_id,
> - fdb->dst->dev,
> - test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER,
> - &fdb->flags),
> - test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED,
> - &fdb->flags));
> + call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE,
> + fdb->dst->dev, &info.info, NULL);
> break;
> case RTM_NEWNEIGH:
> - br_switchdev_fdb_call_notifiers(true, fdb->key.addr.addr,
> - fdb->key.vlan_id,
> - fdb->dst->dev,
> - test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER,
> - &fdb->flags),
> - test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED,
> - &fdb->flags));
> + call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE,
> + fdb->dst->dev, &info.info, NULL);
> break;
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists