[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1732e825-dd8b-6f24-6ead-104467e70a6c@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:48:08 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
CC: "peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: stmmac: should not modify RX descriptor when
STMMAC resume
On 22/04/2021 16:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:53:08 +0000 Joakim Zhang wrote:
>> Could you please help review this patch? It's really beyond my
>> comprehension, why this patch would affect Tegra186 Jetson TX2 board?
>
> Looks okay, please repost as non-RFC.
I still have an issue with a board not being able to resume from suspend
with this patch. Shouldn't we try to resolve that first?
Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists