[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e6467a0-428a-6520-f012-bdd332a7d7ee@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:46:43 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
"peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: stmmac: should not modify RX descriptor when
STMMAC resume
On 22/04/2021 19:20, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/22/2021 11:18 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 22/04/2021 18:32, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/22/2021 10:00 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 22/04/2021 17:12, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> What does the resumption failure looks like? Does the stmmac driver
>>>>> successfully resume from your suspend state, but there is no network
>>>>> traffic? Do you have a log by any chance?
>>>>
>>>> The board fails to resume and appears to hang. With regard to the
>>>> original patch I did find that moving the code to re-init the RX buffers
>>>> to before the PHY is enabled did work [0].
>>>
>>> You indicated that you are using a Broadcom PHY, which specific PHY are
>>> you using?
>>>
>>> I suspect that the stmmac is somehow relying on the PHY to provide its
>>> 125MHz RXC clock back to you in order to have its RX logic work correctly.
>>>
>>> One difference between using the Broadcom PHY and the Generic PHY
>>> drivers could be whether your Broadcom PHY driver entry has a
>>> .suspend/.resume callback implemented or not.
>>
>>
>> This board has a BCM89610 and uses the drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> driver. Interestingly I don't see any suspend/resume handlers for this phy.
>
> Now if you do add .suspend = genphy_suspend and .resume = bcm54xx_resume
> for this PHY entry does it work better?
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and this appears to breaking
networking altogether. In other words, the board was not longer able to
request an IP address. I also tried the genphy_resume and the board was
able to get an IP address, but it is still unable to resume from suspend.
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists