[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB6795D3049415E51A15132F59E6569@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 11:20:59 +0000
From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC net-next] net: stmmac: should not modify RX descriptor when
STMMAC resume
Hi Jakub,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Sent: 2021年5月7日 22:22
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; Jakub Kicinski
> <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com; alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com;
> joabreu@...opsys.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com; andrew@...n.ch; f.fainelli@...il.com;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; treding@...dia.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: stmmac: should not modify RX descriptor when
> STMMAC resume
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> On 06/05/2021 07:33, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> >> Sent: 2021年4月23日 21:48
> >> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Joakim Zhang
> >> <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> >> Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com; alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com;
> >> joabreu@...opsys.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com;
> >> andrew@...n.ch; f.fainelli@...il.com; dl-linux-imx
> >> <linux-imx@....com>; treding@...dia.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: stmmac: should not modify RX
> >> descriptor when STMMAC resume
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22/04/2021 16:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:53:08 +0000 Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >>>> Could you please help review this patch? It's really beyond my
> >>>> comprehension, why this patch would affect Tegra186 Jetson TX2 board?
> >>>
> >>> Looks okay, please repost as non-RFC.
> >>
> >>
> >> I still have an issue with a board not being able to resume from
> >> suspend with this patch. Shouldn't we try to resolve that first?
> >
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > Any updates about this? Could I repost as non-RFC?
>
>
> Sorry no updates from my end. Again, I don't see how we can post this as it
> introduces a regression for us. I am sorry that I am not able to help more here,
> but we have done some extensive testing on the current mainline without your
> change and I don't see any issues with regard to suspend/resume. Hence, this
> does not appear to fix any pre-existing issues. It is possible that we are not
> seeing them.
>
> At this point I think that we really need someone from Synopsys to help us
> understand that exact problem that you are experiencing so that we can
> ensure we have the necessary fix in place and if this is something that is
> applicable to all devices or not.
This patch only removes modification of Rx descriptors when STMMAC resume back, IMHO, it should not affect system suspend/resume function.
Do you have any idea about Joh's issue or any acceptable solution to fix the issue I met? Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> Jon
>
> --
> nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists