[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKUJ4rnZf4u4qUYc@unreal>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:51:46 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...dia.com, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, david.m.ertman@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/22] i40e: Register auxiliary devices to provide RDMA
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:11:58AM -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> Convert i40e to use the auxiliary bus infrastructure to export
> the RDMA functionality of the device to the RDMA driver.
> Register i40e client auxiliary RDMA device on the auxiliary bus per
> PCIe device function for the new auxiliary rdma driver (irdma) to
> attach to.
>
> The global i40e_register_client and i40e_unregister_client symbols
> will be obsoleted once irdma replaces i40iw in the kernel
> for the X722 device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 2 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_client.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
The amount of obfuscation in this driver is astonishing.
I would expect that after this series, the i40e_client_add_*() would be cleaned,
for example simple grep of I40E_CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR shows that i40e_register_client()
still have no-go code.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists