| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1621402253-27200-16-git-send-email-tanghui20@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:30:48 +0800
From: Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 15/20] net: smsc: remove leading spaces before tabs
There are a few leading spaces before tabs and remove it by running the
following commard:
$ find . -name '*.c' | xargs sed -r -i 's/^[ ]+\t/\t/'
$ find . -name '*.h' | xargs sed -r -i 's/^[ ]+\t/\t/'
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c | 14 ++++++-------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c
index 4b2330d..bf7c8c8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ struct smc_local {
struct sk_buff * saved_skb;
/*
- . This keeps track of how many packets that I have
- . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know
+ . This keeps track of how many packets that I have
+ . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know
. that all of these have been sent.
*/
int packets_waiting;
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void smc_reset( int ioaddr )
/* Note: It doesn't seem that waiting for the MMU busy is needed here,
but this is a place where future chipsets _COULD_ break. Be wary
- of issuing another MMU command right after this */
+ of issuing another MMU command right after this */
outb( 0, ioaddr + INT_MASK );
}
@@ -521,9 +521,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
SMC_SELECT_BANK( 2 );
outw( MC_ALLOC | numPages, ioaddr + MMU_CMD );
/*
- . Performance Hack
+ . Performance Hack
.
- . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send
+ . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send
. it now. Otherwise, I enable an interrupt and wait for one to be
. available.
.
@@ -540,17 +540,17 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
if ( status & IM_ALLOC_INT ) {
/* acknowledge the interrupt */
outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INTERRUPT );
- break;
+ break;
}
- } while ( -- time_out );
+ } while ( -- time_out );
- if ( !time_out ) {
+ if ( !time_out ) {
/* oh well, wait until the chip finds memory later */
SMC_ENABLE_INT( IM_ALLOC_INT );
PRINTK2((CARDNAME": memory allocation deferred.\n"));
/* it's deferred, but I'll handle it later */
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
- }
+ }
/* or YES! I can send the packet now.. */
smc_hardware_send_packet(dev);
netif_wake_queue(dev);
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev )
#endif
/* send the packet length ( +6 for status, length and ctl byte )
- and the status word ( set to zeros ) */
+ and the status word ( set to zeros ) */
#ifdef USE_32_BIT
outl( (length +6 ) << 16 , ioaddr + DATA_1 );
#else
@@ -629,8 +629,8 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev )
/* send the actual data
. I _think_ it's faster to send the longs first, and then
. mop up by sending the last word. It depends heavily
- . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be
- . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take
+ . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be
+ . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take
. almost as much time as is saved?
*/
#ifdef USE_32_BIT
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static int __init smc_findirq(int ioaddr)
outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INT_MASK );
/*
- . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just
+ . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just
. reset so all the memory is available
*/
outw( MC_ALLOC | 1, ioaddr + MMU_CMD );
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
goto err_out;
}
/* The above MIGHT indicate a device, but I need to write to further
- test this. */
+ test this. */
outw( 0x0, ioaddr + BANK_SELECT );
bank = inw( ioaddr + BANK_SELECT );
if ( (bank & 0xFF00 ) != 0x3300 ) {
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
goto err_out;
}
/* well, we've already written once, so hopefully another time won't
- hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1,
+ hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1,
so I can access the base address register */
SMC_SELECT_BANK(1);
base_address_register = inw( ioaddr + BASE );
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
dev->base_addr = ioaddr;
/*
- . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 )
+ . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 )
*/
SMC_SELECT_BANK( 1 );
for ( i = 0; i < 6; i += 2 ) {
@@ -938,8 +938,8 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
/*
Now, I want to find out more about the chip. This is sort of
- redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having
- one VERY long probe procedure.
+ redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having
+ one VERY long probe procedure.
*/
SMC_SELECT_BANK(3);
revision_register = inw( ioaddr + REVISION );
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
/*
. If dev->irq is 0, then the device has to be banged on to see
. what the IRQ is.
- .
+ .
. This banging doesn't always detect the IRQ, for unknown reasons.
. a workaround is to reset the chip and try again.
.
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr)
.
. Specifying an IRQ is done with the assumption that the user knows
. what (s)he is doing. No checking is done!!!!
- .
+ .
*/
if ( dev->irq < 2 ) {
int trials;
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int smc_open(struct net_device *dev)
}
/*
- According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address
+ According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address
at this point, because the (l)user can set it with an
ioctl. Easily done...
*/
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
index cbde83f..813ea94 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
@@ -671,19 +671,19 @@ smc_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
status = SMC_GET_INT(lp);
if (status & IM_ALLOC_INT) {
SMC_ACK_INT(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT);
- break;
+ break;
}
- } while (--poll_count);
+ } while (--poll_count);
smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags);
lp->pending_tx_skb = skb;
- if (!poll_count) {
+ if (!poll_count) {
/* oh well, wait until the chip finds memory later */
netif_stop_queue(dev);
DBG(2, dev, "TX memory allocation deferred.\n");
SMC_ENABLE_INT(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT);
- } else {
+ } else {
/*
* Allocation succeeded: push packet to the chip's own memory
* immediately.
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static int smc_findirq(struct smc_local *lp)
SMC_SET_INT_MASK(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT);
/*
- * Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just
+ * Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just
* reset so all the memory is available
*/
SMC_SET_MMU_CMD(lp, MC_ALLOC | 1);
@@ -1998,8 +1998,8 @@ static int smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, void __iomem *ioaddr,
/* Grab the IRQ */
retval = request_irq(dev->irq, smc_interrupt, irq_flags, dev->name, dev);
- if (retval)
- goto err_out;
+ if (retval)
+ goto err_out;
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PXA
# ifdef SMC_USE_PXA_DMA
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists