[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKW3YhuDSHQtR4Tb@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 03:12:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/4] net: marvell: prestera: try to load previous
fw version
> +static int prestera_fw_get(struct prestera_fw *fw)
> +{
> + int ver_maj = PRESTERA_SUPP_FW_MAJ_VER;
> + int ver_min = PRESTERA_SUPP_FW_MIN_VER;
> + char fw_path[128];
> + int err;
> +
> +pick_fw_ver:
> + snprintf(fw_path, sizeof(fw_path), PRESTERA_FW_PATH_FMT,
> + ver_maj, ver_min);
> +
> + err = request_firmware_direct(&fw->bin, fw_path, fw->dev.dev);
> + if (err) {
> + if (ver_maj == PRESTERA_SUPP_FW_MAJ_VER) {
> + ver_maj--;
> + goto pick_fw_ver;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(fw->dev.dev, "failed to request firmware file\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
So lets say for the sake of the argument, you have version 3.0 and
2.42. It looks like this code will first try to load version 3.0. If
that fails, ver_maj is decremented, so it tries 2.0, which also fails
because it should be looking for 2.42. I don't think this decrement is
a good idea.
Also:
> + dev_err(fw->dev.dev, "failed to request firmware file\n");
It would be useful to say what version you are actually looking for,
so the user can go find the correct firmware.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists