[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525115738.facebwqt7y6k6klv@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:57:38 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: add
compatible strings for SJA1110
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 07:24:36PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/24/2021 4:22 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> >
> > There are 4 variations of the SJA1110 switch which have a different set
> > of MII protocols supported per port. Document the compatible strings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>
> Time to YAMLify that binding?
I'm afraid that will sidetrack in another discussion about
sja1105,role-mac and sja1105,role-phy which I'm not prepared to have
right now. Those boolean properties are to my knowledge unused, so I
could remove them, but the phy-mode = "mii" + sja1105,role-phy would
have to be replaced with phy-mode = "revmii" and similarly, a new
phy-mode would have to be introduced for phy-mode = "revrmii" or
something.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists