[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKz4xA3QNIoEv5pp@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:16:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO
buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX
> > It however sounds like you have the two busses one level deeper?
> >
> > It would be good if you document this as part of the binding.
>
> Yes, it looks like this:
>
> ethernet-switch@2 {
> compatible = "nxp,sja1110a";
>
> ethernet-ports {
> ...
> };
>
> mdio {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> mdio@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> compatible = "nxp,sja1110-base-t1-mdio";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> sw2_port5_base_t1_phy: ethernet-phy@1 {
> compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
> reg = <0x1>;
> };
>
> ...
> };
>
We should run this by Rob.
That is probably not the intention of
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml, it works because of
additionalProperties: true
What meaning does reg have, in mdio@0?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists