netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect(): extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 16:08:11 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect():
 extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 06:30:36AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This patch extends the flags of the phy that's being connected with the
> port specific flags of the switch port.
> 
> This is needed to handle a port specific erratum of the KSZ8873 switch,
> which is added in a later patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 2 +-
>  net/dsa/slave.c           | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 96d8e88b4e46..167c2277814f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int phylink_attach_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy,
>  	if (pl->phydev)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, 0, interface);
> +	return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, phy->dev_flags, interface);

I don't think this has any benefit. phy_attach_direct() does this
internally:

        phydev->dev_flags |= flags;

which means the above change is effectively doing:

        phydev->dev_flags |= phydev->dev_flags;

So, are you sure you need this?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!